Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Garden Mum's avatar

Hello Apple Pie,

I’m one of your devoted gross of subscribers and I always read your blog with great interest. This is the first time in my life that I make a comment to a blog post and I suppose there are many others like me, for whom this problem has occupied a lot of life energy. It would be devastating for your blog to dwell to much on this topic, I agree.

I have read an uncountable number of books on the subject since 1968, when I was 16 years old. Less calories than the body needs to sustain it’s weight is what is necessary, they all told me, and provided recipes for for calorie-low fat-low food. It was tragic to follow these diets, always hungry and miserable. As with Weightwatchers (they have probably modernized their diets by now).

Then came the low carb awareness and changed the whole game set-up. Low carb works. New books in the book shelf. I don’t feel well on a very low carb diet in the long run though, so after a few initial days to tell the body it’s time to start burning the excess fat I add some more vegetables to get about 30-40 g of carb each day.

A low carb, high fat diet works on it’s own if you are a person with well regulated apetite and hunger feelings that are adequate. That’s not me. I have never been like that, always overeating.

I have come to realize that for me it’s impossible to keep my best weight without keeping track of my calorie balance.

But as you point out, counting calories really sucks. So I have made myself a simple but useful Excel workbook that makes it a lot easier. It was a lot of fun to make it and since it’s my own baby I love it. It takes some minutes each day to use it. This is why I only use it, when I’m not overly busy with my main interest, which is and always have been gardening. So when gardening starts taking all my time I put the excel sheet to rest for half a year and inevitably gain around 1 kg per month in spite of all the exercise I get in the garden. And when the garden goes to rest, the workbook has to be awakened. And enough exercise must also be incorporated. The Excel workbook accounts for that too. It’s quite accurate now, so that I can see just how the present day’s calorie balance have influenced my weight. This is important and takes away the guessing and wishful thinking, like ”Now it seems that I finally can eat anything I like, without adding weight”. There are plateaus both in gaining and loosing weight. Without exercise it’s virtually impossible to lose weight. A pedometer is a good device.

Cutting down a lot on carbohydrates is essential. Exercising is essential. And not overeating is essential. So eat enough at meals and eat low carb. Eat enough fat so that you can feel that ”almost full”-feeling.

And exercise. I need at least 9000 steps om my pedometer in order to be able to eat a reasonable amount of food and still lose weight.

Having such an engineering approach to the problem of losing weight is really not something you can show people that you want to regard you as a normal person. I have tried to give it to some people I know well, and who know me as an otherwise sound person, but none of them have been able to take it on, despite a desperate need to lose weight. And even they got a little suspiscious of me, seeing that I have such a trait that they couldn’t relate to... Since you seem to be a rather engineering minded person yourself I seems safe to tell you about it. To me it has been a real game changer.

There are a lot of similar solutions to buy at the Internet. They have never worked for me. It must be tailor made. I have used my Excel sheet for many years now. It’s built on the Swedish Food Councils big database and completed with the facts of other foodstuff that I like to eat, not included in their database.

To simplify life, I have a rather standardized manner of eating, with a couple of breakfasts, ten different lunch alternatives and a few evening meals. The main meal is lunch.

I have always had the ideal that eating should be instinctual and just work automatically. But I’m not that way and I suspect that most people overweight is not either. After I accepted that I have a handicap not being able to control this well and made my Excel solution, life has become much easier. And I have indeed, little by little, come to better understanding of what to eat and when I have eaten enough and when not to eat.

The Excel workbook consists of three sheets.

The recording sheet, where I record everything I eat. It has a simple LOOKUP function and yields the total amount of calories and macros of the day. It's easy to use.

The data sheet for the LOOKUP function

The result sheet, that gives peace in mind. Here I put the totals from the recording sheet and the reading of my pedometer and here I write every days morning weight. I totally agree with Cubicle Farmer that this is essential (for me). I also think, like him, that it is essential to have "sports-perspective" on the whole thing. It must be fun.

Expand full comment
gregvp's avatar

Thank you for writing this. Improving the world's health, a gross at a time.

If one is inveterately lazy, as I am, the optimal form of exercise is rucking. Carrying a backpack for a couple of hours, up and down hills (or stairs, if your town is flat), three times a week. Maintains cardio fitness, core and back chain muscle condition, joint health, and balance. Start with ten percent of your body weight and work up to a quarter, more if you like. Water bottles are handy units of weight, especially if you use metric: a litre of water is a kilogramme. Rucking is strongly recommended by Peter Attia in "Outlive", amongst others.

I like tramping (NZ word; it's like hiking, but with much more mud, rougher tracks (trails), and steeper hills) so I get my rucking in bursts in the weekend.

On diet: in my youth, I one day told myself, "I'm not the kind of person who likes sweet things". Somehow that has mostly worked. A few years ago I had to add "or pasta".

I'm so lazy that I quit my desk job and now work a job that requires me to be standing up and doing moderate exercise eight hours a day. My step counter regularly records fifteen thousand steps or more, but I think it overcounts. If I were younger I would retrain as an electrician. Rucking as a job, with extra joint mobility exercises built in.

I read somewhere that men respond well to regular weighing, but women much less so. Social proof is more important for the fair ones, apparently. When weighing yourself remember to allow for recent intake and removal: half a litre of water and two cups of tea (my normal morning routine) is a kilogramme. And don't worry about single numbers; the trend is the thing. Don't start worrying about that extra kilogramme until it's been there for a month.

Finally, what really matters for health is fat around the viscera. This is most directly measured by waist to height ratio. Measure around your waist and divide that by your height. The healthy range is 0.4 to 0.5 (two fifths to one half, for devotees of old number systems). Works with all body plans, with amputees, and with all ages above infant, apparently.

"Statistical evidence supports that WHtR is a better predictor of cardiovascular, diabetes and stroke risk than the body mass index (BMI) because it accounts for the distribution of abdominal fat, which is known to increase the aforementioned risks.

"Abdominal fat affects organs like the heart, liver and kidneys more adversely in terms of cardiometabolic risk, than fat around the hips and bottom.

"In a comprehensive study by Lee et al. that revised 10 studies, BMI was the poorest discriminator for cardiovascular risk factors whilst the WHtR was the best discriminator for hypertension, diabetes, and dyslipidemia in both sexes." - https://www.mdapp.co/waist-to-height-ratio-whtr-calculator-433/

Edit: I see that page has written "WHtR" where they mean "WtHR".

Expand full comment
40 more comments...

No posts